Started watching a series on Basher Assad this evening.The prog was slighted against him, in tone : his father had seized Rule by force and Basher is a Dictator.
So what’s the difference between him and the British royal family? Royal, brown-nosed, arse-licking royalists in this country are fond of saying that the queen (who has no qualifications) is a wonderful Monarch.
But she doesn’t stand for election. The only way we could get rid of those parasites would be by civil-war as is the case in Syria.
How is it that she is legitimate but Assad isn’t ? There is no statute of limitations in the UK – so how is it that that silly old trout in Buckingham palace has any more Right to her Dictatorship than old Basher ?
Passage of time does not validate a crime.